| 1. |
i2 Technologies Garners Semiconductor Award (3 Pages)
by Steve McVey
Oct 25, 1999
Abstract : DALLAS, Texas -- i2 Technologies (Nasdaq: ITWO), the leading provider of intelligent eBusiness solutions, today was awarded top honors from Semiconductor International's 1999 Editor's Choice Best Product Awards Program. i2 is recognized for their innovative RHYTHM(R) suite of semiconductor solutions that are used to improve production manufacturing operations and environmental responsibility in the semiconductor industry. For the past 10 years, the Editor's Choice Best Product Awards Program has honored superior performance of equipment, materials and software that have advanced the progress and conditions of the semiconductor industry. W
Type: Article
|
| 2. |
ERP Showdown—Round 2! Exact Macola ES vs. Infor SyteLine vs. QAD MFG/PRO (1 Pages)
by Dylan Persaud
Abstract : I'm Dylan Persaud, senior analyst at Technology Evaluation Centers. Due to the overwhelming response to our first ERP Showdown, we're pleased to present another head-to-head discrete enterprise resource planning (ERP) comparison. Here, then, is ERP Showdown, Round 2!—featuring Exact Macola ES vs. Infor SyteLine vs. QAD MFG/PRO.
Type: White Paper
|
| 3. |
Great Plains' eEnterprise Solution 'N Sync with Microsoft's New Platforms (3 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Oct 31, 2000
Abstract : Great Plains announced that its eEnterprise solution scales considerably better on Microsoft SQL Server 2000 in comparison to Microsoft's SQL Server 7.0.
Type: Article
|
| 4. |
Critical Path and NETIAN Strike Strategic Messaging Alliance (3 Pages)
by P. Hayes
Jul 28, 2000
Abstract : NETIAN, South Korea’s largest ISP has selected Critical Path’s Inscribe messaging service to meet the demands of South Korea’s explosive e-mail growth. Critical Path’s Inscribe messaging solution includes e-mail, instant messaging, a homepage builder or HTML editor and bulletin boards.
Type: Article
|
| 5. |
Liberty Alliance vs. WS-I; J2EE vs. .NET; Overwhelmed .YET? Part 2: Comparison, Challenges, & Recommendations (4 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Mar 21, 2002
Abstract : The battle for the dominance in Web services has so far largely been a war of words without the clear winner yet (and not any time soon). While interoperability seems to currently be the motivation for bigger players to suspend hostilities and focus on standards adoption, the desire for domination will tempt them to weave dependencies on their products into their strategies.
Type: Article
|
| 6. |
Comparison of ERP and CRM Markets' Life cycle Snapshots (5 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Jan 31, 2004
Abstract : Today's enterprise applications are required as a matter of course to address more than the processes taking place within the walls of an enterprise. Almost all traditional ERP vendors (small and big alike) had to experience a wake-up call and have long been trying to expand their product offering in tune with the ever-changing trends and requirements of the new collaborative economy. The need for providing a full, comprehensive CRM suite rather than an individual solution or a bundle of point solutions for each distinct CRM area remains firm, and will urge further market consolidation.
Type: Article
|
| 7. |
(XML + mySAP.com) – Spin = Status Quo (3 Pages)
by A. Turner
May 16, 2000
Abstract : SAP announced its involvement in XML-based Internet content standards initiatives, detailing its involvement with standards committees, acceptance of XML, integration with their products, the creation of an XML interface repository and a partner certification program. What does it amount to?
Type: Article
|
| 8. |
Desktop PCs: Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss… (Dell) (8 Pages)
by C. McNulty
May 4, 2000
Abstract : This year, the market can be summed up as 3D: Dell Direct Desktop. In comparison, Compaq and IBM are looking a little flat.
Type: Article
|
| 9. |
CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part Two: Using A Knowledge Base To Reduce The Time, Risk And Cost Of A CRM Selection (6 Pages)
by Lou Talarico & Kevin Ramesan
Apr 19, 2003
Abstract : Using a knowledge base in the selection process can reduce the time, risk and cost of procuring technology. Well constructed knowledge bases that are used in a tested selection methodology reduce the RFI process from months to weeks, eliminate data quality issues and allow an apples to apples comparison of vendor offerings.
Type: Article
|
购物车 
