|
| |
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next
>>
1. |
Compare ORACLE side-by-side with BAAN, SAP, J.D. EDWARDS, EPICOR, QAD, and 35+ other ERP vendors
Nov 23, 2009
Today's usage of Decision Support Systems (DSS), combined with vetted ERP knowledge bases, allows organizations to save time and money, achieving better and more reliable/fully-documented decisions, a quantum improvement over the widely-used subjective process of selecting complex enterprise software...
|
| 2. |
ERP − Distribution Showdown! Oracle's JD Edwards vs. TGI's Enterprise 21 (1 Pages)
by Dylan Persaud
Abstract : Using our ERP - Distribution Evaluation Center, we compared Oracle's JD Edwards and Technology Group International head-on. For the overall rankings portion, we looked at these vendors' solutions in two basic configurations, with and without back-office (human resources [HR] and financials) functionality. To eliminate any chance of bias and to ensure a level playing field, all 3, 414 criteria comprising all the modules and submodules in the ERP - distribution request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority...
Type: White Paper
|
| 3. |
Oracle Product Showdown! JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. E-Business Suite by Neil Stolovitsky
Abstract : In JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and E-Business Suite, Oracle has two of the most popular enterprise solutions available in the marketplace today. To compare these two Oracle products, we looked at six standard enterprise resource planning (ERP) modules: supply chain management, distribution process management, web commerce, human resources, financials, and product technology. To eliminate any chance of bias and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,214 criteria that make up these six modules (and their submodules) in our ERP Evaluation Center were given equal weight and priorityﾅ
Type: White Paper
|
| 4. |
EAM Showdown! IFS vs. Mincom vs. CHAMPS (1 Pages)
by Sadat Zaman
Abstract : Using our EAM Evaluation Center, we compared Mincom Ellipse, CHAMPS, and IFS head-on. For the overall rankings, we looked at the vendors in two basic configurations: with back-office (HR and financials) functionality, for a total of eight main modules, and without, for a total of six main modules. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,146 criteria comprising the modules and submodules in the EAM request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority.
Type: White Paper
|
| 5. |
Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact (7 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Nov 30, 2001
Abstract : Navision has been expanding its coverage in terms of geography, vertical industries, and product functionality. Globally, it has become one of the largest independent small-to-mid-market enterprise system providers.
Type: Article
|
| 6. |
Microsoft Joins XML Specification Committee for Financials (3 Pages)
by M. Reed
May 2, 2000
Abstract : Microsoft (NASDAQ: MFST) has joined the Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) committee to help launch an XML-based standard for translating financial reports between applications. Formerly known as the Extensible Financial Reporting Markup Language (XFRML), the language should allow companies to use the Internet to exchange financial reports.
Type: Article
|
| 7. |
Geac Upgrades Accounting And Human-Resources Apps -- SQL Release 6.0 Simplifies Purchasing And HR Services For Midsize Companies (3 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Jan 31, 2000
Abstract : Geac SmartEnterprise Solutions released an updated version of its human resources and accounting applications for midsize companies at the beginning of January. SQL Financials and HR Release 6.0 are available immediately, as are a set of employee self-service applications that integrate with the suite. Geac SmartEnterprise, a division of Geac Computer Corp., acquired the SQL suite last year from Clarus Corp.
Type: Article
|
| 8. |
MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 4: Competition and User Recommendations (2 Pages)
by P.J. Jakovljevic
Nov 22, 2002
Abstract : Production management remains MAPICS’ strongest spot, and, therefore, it has often been implemented only in manufacturing divisions of large global organizations that use a Tier 1 ERP product for corporate financials and/or HR applications. Therefore, executing the ambitious initiatives with its modest albeit solid resources compared to the above competitors will be a notable challenge.
Type: Article
|
| 9. |
Enterprise Financial Application Software: How Some of the Big ERP Vendors Stack Up (3 Pages)
by Steve McVey
Dec 25, 2001
Abstract : Contrary to what vendors may contend, not all of them are able to supply a cost effective solution that satisfies the critical requirements of an organization. In this case study from a recent selection engagement for a large series book publisher, we size up Oracle, JD Edwards, PeopleSoft, and Lawson in terms of corporate viability, vision, product functionality, technology, and cost.
Type: Article
|
| 10. |
'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: PeopleSoft (7 Pages)
by Randy Garland
Nov 26, 2001
Abstract : PeopleSoft has risen from its relatively humble origins in the Human Resource Management Systems (HRMS) arena, its sole focus as it begun life in 1987. Over the course of a decade or so, it added Supply Chain Management and Financials to its list of application offerings. In the last few years, in the face of slowing cash flows from its traditional strongholds, it has gone full bore toward Internet-based enterprise-wide - even cross-enterprise - solutions, trying to enter the game and be competitive with other top tier ERP-turned Collaborative Commerce vendors. Showing fiscal growth and, very-recently, notably-improved market acceptance, Peoplesoft may be the enterprise software turnaround story of the last decade.
Type: Article
|
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next
>>
|
|
|
购物车 
